Flint - Gasoline lighter - Classic lighter - Black - TOM®

Article number: Deal 125
Tom
Flint - Gasoline lighter - Classic lighter - Black  - TOM® Flint - Gasoline lighter - Classic lighter - Black  - TOM®
Flint - Gasoline lighter - Classic lighter - Black  - TOM®
Flint - Gasoline lighter - Classic lighter - Black  - TOM®

Condition: nieuw

Variatie
6,99
per unit
In stock
Shipping costs: € 2,80
Voor 20:00 uur besteld, morgen in huis
  • Free shipping from €30 in the NL & Be
  • 30-day cooling-off period
  • Free to pick up at 24winkelen
  • Shop now and pay later
Do you have a question about this product?

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Description

Flint - Gasoline lighter - Classic lighter - Black - TOM®

Inspired by iconic American style, this classic petrol lighter is crafted from durable metal, making it long lasting and able to withstand everyday use. Whether you're going camping, hiking or just want to start a fire, this lighter is always ready.

With its classic design and sturdy construction, this lighter pays tribute to American craftsmanship tradition. It is compact and portable, so you can easily carry it in your pocket, bag or survival gear. This petrol lighter provides a reliable flame that lasts even in the most challenging conditions. The refillable design allows you to easily refill the fuel, meaning you can use this classic firelighter again and again. The lighter has a safe child lock and is supplied without filling.

Specifications:

Brand: TOM®
Type of lighter: Gasoline lighter
Cap: MA Black
Body: Matt Black
Dimensions: 5.7x1.1x3.6 cm
Tank type: Refillable
Flames: Soft flame
​Printable: Yes
Without filling!

Specifications

Colour
Black
Brand
TOM®
Refillable?
YES
Flame Type
Soft Flame

Reviews

View all reviews from our customers below

5,0
on the basis of 1 Reviews
1
0
0
0
0

Adam

Prachtige aansteker met een klassieke vuursteen. En de levering was bovendien erg snel.

Please contact us

You can contact us and ask your question via the options below.

Add review

What do you think of the article?

5,0